Friday, July 4, 2025

Continuous Feedback Is a Lie Without Psychological Safety

 


Psychological safety describes a workplace atmosphere in which people feel free to share ideas, take calculated risks, acknowledge errors, or seek clarification without fearing negative consequences. Introduced by Harvard Business School’s Amy Edmondson, this idea underpins the success of high-achieving, creative teams. Extensive studies by a leading internet company have confirmed that psychological safety is the top driver of innovation, effectiveness, and productivity.

Yet the feedback sessions mostly don’t mirror these opinions. For instance, if the team sits on a project post-mortem where feedback flows freely, they need to be able to have key takeaways, and they need to be able to say their part instead of just being an audience. It should not come from a place of judgment but a place of dialogue because feedback means little if people don’t feel safe enough to absorb it.

‘Real-time feedback’ has become a silver bullet for performance. Yet in too many workplaces, it backfires. Do you know why? Because honest observations cut two ways. When someone points out a mistake, the instinct is to defend or withdraw. Without a foundation of trust, feedback feels like an attack. Imagine sharing your work only to have peers zero in on every flaw. Would you come back next week ready for more? Probably not.
Why Psychological Safety is Important in Workplaces?

Psychological safety is the belief that you can speak up, take risks, and even fail without fear of humiliation or punishment. In its absence, feedback triggers self-preservation. You tune out or pretend to agree while stewing inside. When people feel safe, however, they interpret feedback as a gift, an opportunity to learn. They lean in rather than shut down. That shift transforms a critique into a chance for growth. Creating psychological safety isn’t an HR checklist item. It’s a daily practice rooted in three behaviors:

Vulnerability from the top: Leaders must model imperfection. When a manager shares a recent misstep, missing a deadline or misreading client needs, it sends a message: ‘It’s okay to be human here.’ That admission breaks down barriers faster than any workshop.

Equal voice in every room: In meetings, rotate who speaks first. Give quieter team members the floor. When everyone contributes, criticism feels collective, rather than targeted. It’s easier to listen to ‘Let’s refine this slide deck’ when you also hear peers share ideas.

Intentional appreciation: Regularly call out specific strengths in public forums. Honest praise creates emotional credit. When a correction follows, it comes from a place of balance rather than pure negativity.

Practical Steps for Safe Feedback

Turning these principles into routines takes effort. Here are actions any team can adopt immediately:

Two stars and a wish: Ask feedback givers to name two things the recipient did well and one thing to improve. Balance softens the blow and makes suggestions feel fair.

Feedback wrap-up: End every feedback session by asking, ‘What next steps will you try?’ Shifting focus from critique to action helps people leave with a clear path forward.

Anonymous pulse checks: Quarterly surveys can gauge whether team members feel safe speaking up. Simple questions like ‘Can you admit mistakes without fear?’ reveal gaps you can address.

Feedback buddies: Pair colleagues who meet monthly to exchange observations in a low-stakes setting. Working with a single partner reduces anxiety compared to public forums.
Measuring the Impact

How do you know your safety efforts are working? Track these indicators:

Uptick in initiative: When people propose new ideas or volunteer for stretch assignments, it signals confidence in their ability to learn from feedback.

Reduced blame culture: Fewer instances of finger-pointing after setbacks mean teams see problems as shared challenges, not personal failures.

Faster course corrections: If projects pivot swiftly in response to feedback instead of derailing, psychological safety is fueling agility.

Higher retention of top performers: Talented employees stay where they can grow. Improved retention rates among high performers reflect a culture that supports development.
Conclusion

Continuous feedback is more than a process. It’s a conversation born of trust. Without psychological safety, feedback slips into criticism, and best intentions falter. When leaders embrace vulnerability, ensure every voice matters, and balance critique with appreciation, the door to real growth swings wide open. Feedback then becomes the engine of improvement rather than a source of anxiety. The next time you roll out a real-time feedback tool, remember: it’s not the technology that drives change, but the human connections that make learning feel safe.
#PsychologicalSafety
#SpeakUpCulture
#FeedbackCulture
#TrustAtWork
#SafeToSpeak
#RealFeedback
#FearlessWorkplace
#HumanCenteredHR
#CourageousConversations
#AuthenticWorkplace
Human Resources Management Awards
website Link : humanresourcesmanagement.org
Nomination Link : humanresourcesmanagement.org/award-nomination/?ecategory=Awards&rcategory=Awardee
Contact Us : contact@humanresourcesmanagement.org

Follows On :
Youtube : www.youtube.com/@humanresource-u1h
Twitter : x.com/resources185061
Blogger : humanresourcesmanagement14.blogspot.com
Pinterest : in.pinterest.com/resources737
Facebook : www.facebook.com/people/Human-Resources-Human-Resources/pfbid0MSGu8YPWMiRigLKeNJ7GStPWdwSGxie7zXbFfCXgohcxKYvmxfaRXCBcuV8pAKQwl
Instagram : www.instagram.com/reso.urces34

 


Thursday, July 3, 2025

DRDO Tests Indigenous Communication Systems

 


In recent developments, the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) has successfully conducted field trials of two advanced communication systems. The Defence Electronics Application Laboratory (DEAL) in Dehradun executed these trials in Joshimath, Uttarakhand. This initiative signifies a strong commitment to indigenous technologies that boost national security.
Overview of the Communication Systems

The two systems tested are the Software Defined Radio (SDR) Manpack and the Compact Transhorizon Communication System (CTCS). Both systems are designed to improve communication capabilities in challenging environments. The SDR Manpack allows for secure communication across various frequency bands, while the CTCS ensures high data rate connectivity in remote areas lacking civil communication infrastructure.
Objectives of the Trials

The primary aim of the trials was to validate the performance of the SDR and CTCS under real-world conditions. This involved testing in diverse terrains and operational environments. The focus was on meeting user-defined operational benchmarks established by various security agencies.
Collaboration with Security Agencies

The trials were conducted in collaboration with the Ministry of Home Affairs and Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs). Officers from several paramilitary forces, including ITBP, SSB, BSF, and CRPF, participated in the trials. This collaboration ensured that the systems were rigorously tested and evaluated by end-users.
Technical Specifications of SDR and CTCS

The SDR is a secure system capable of supporting legacy communication while providing digital voice and data communication. It operates across multiple channels and frequency bands, making it versatile for naval and tactical communications. The CTCS, on the other hand, is designed for large hop terrestrial backhaul communication, enabling connectivity in areas where traditional communication networks are unavailable.
Significance for National Security

The successful trials of these systems reinforce DRDO’s commitment to developing indigenous solutions for national security. The ability to maintain secure and reliable communication in remote and challenging environments is crucial for effective military and paramilitary operations.
Future Implications

The development of such communication systems has far-reaching implications. It reduces dependence on foreign technology and enhances the operational capabilities of Indian security forces. As these systems are integrated into national defence strategies, they are expected to improve situational awareness and response times.
#DRDO
#MadeInIndia
#IndigenousTechnology
#DefenseTech
#AtmanirbharBharat
#MilitaryCommunication
#IndianDefense
#TechForNation
#DRDOTech
#SecureCommunications
Human Resources Management Awards
website Link : humanresourcesmanagement.org
Nomination Link : humanresourcesmanagement.org/award-nomination/?ecategory=Awards&rcategory=Awardee
Contact Us : contact@humanresourcesmanagement.org
Follows On :
Youtube : www.youtube.com/@humanresource-u1h
Twitter : x.com/resources185061
Blogger : humanresourcesmanagement14.blogspot.com
Pinterest : in.pinterest.com/resources737
Facebook : www.facebook.com/people/Human-Resources-Human-Resources/pfbid0MSGu8YPWMiRigLKeNJ7GStPWdwSGxie7zXbFfCXgohcxKYvmxfaRXCBcuV8pAKQwl
Instagram : www.instagram.com/reso.urces34

Wednesday, July 2, 2025

Microsoft to lay off 9,000 employees: Here’s what we know

 


Microsoft announced on Wednesday that it will lay off approximately 9,000 employees, affecting just under 4% of its global workforce.

The job cuts will impact various teams, regions, and levels of seniority, according to a source familiar with the matter, News.Az reported, citing CNBC.
Also Read: Employees offered voluntary exit as Nissan plans workforce trim

The announcement was made on the second day of Microsoft’s 2026 fiscal year. Executives at the Redmond, Washington-based company often initiate organisational changes at the start of a new fiscal cycle.

“We continue to implement organisational changes necessary to best position the company and teams for success in a dynamic marketplace,” a Microsoft spokesperson said in an email.

This move adds to a series of layoffs the company has already carried out this calendar year. In January, Microsoft reduced its headcount by less than 1%, citing performance-based factors. It then eliminated more than 6,000 jobs in May, followed by at least 300 more in June.

As of June 2024, Microsoft employed around 228,000 people worldwide. In the previous year, 2023, it laid off 10,000 workers.

The company’s largest layoff to date occurred in 2014, when 18,000 employees were let go following Microsoft’s acquisition of Nokia’s devices and services division.

As with earlier rounds, including the May cuts, Microsoft is reportedly aiming to reduce the number of management layers between individual contributors and senior executives, the source told CNBC.

Despite the workforce reductions, Microsoft remains financially strong. In the March quarter, the company reported $70 billion in revenue and nearly $26 billion in net income—figures that surpassed Wall Street expectations. This performance has kept Microsoft ranked among the most profitable companies on the S&P 500 index, according to FactSet.

Executives are forecasting approximately 14% year-over-year revenue growth for the June quarter, driven by ongoing expansion in Azure cloud services and subscriptions to corporate productivity software.

Microsoft shares were down about 0.6% at the beginning of Wednesday’s trading session, while the S&P 500 index remained largely flat.

Other software providers including Autodesk, Chegg and CrowdStrike have also trimmed their workforces in 2025. Earlier on Wednesday, payroll processing firm ADP reported that the U.S. private sector lost 33,000 jobs in June, despite economists polled by Dow Jones predicting a gain of 100,000.

#MicrosoftLayoffs2025
#AIRestructuring
#StreamliningOperations
#XboxLayoffs
#FlattenTheRank
#CloudFocus
#TechIndustryCuts
#NadellaMoves
#WorkforceReorganization
#NextGenMicrosoft
Human Resources Management Awards
website Link : humanresourcesmanagement.org
Nomination Link : humanresourcesmanagement.org/award-nomination/?ecategory=Awards&rcategory=Awardee
Contact Us : contact@humanresourcesmanagement.org

Follows On :
Youtube : www.youtube.com/@humanresource-u1h
Twitter : x.com/resources185061
Blogger : humanresourcesmanagement14.blogspot.com
Pinterest : in.pinterest.com/resources737
Facebook : www.facebook.com/people/Human-Resources-Human-Resources/pfbid0MSGu8YPWMiRigLKeNJ7GStPWdwSGxie7zXbFfCXgohcxKYvmxfaRXCBcuV8pAKQwl
Instagram : www.instagram.com/reso.urces34

Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Computer Technology with 2D Materials

 

Recent advancements in computer technology have emerged from The Pennsylvania State University. Researchers have successfully built a computer using two-dimensional (2D) materials, marking milestone in the evolution of semiconductor technology. This development offers a potential alternative to traditional silicon-based systems, which have faced limitations as devices continue to shrink in size.
CMOS Technology

Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) technology is the foundation of modern electronic circuits. It is known for low power consumption and high component density. The recent shift towards 2D materials like molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) and tungsten diselenide (WSe2) aims to enhance the functionalities of these circuits. These materials are incredibly thin and scalable, making them suitable for future electronics.
Limitations of Silicon

Silicon has been the mainstay of electronics since the invention of the transistor in 1947. However, its effectiveness has plateaued. The miniaturisation of devices has led to issues like increased leakage current and power consumption. Researchers believe silicon has reached its limits in terms of size reduction and performance.
The Role of 2D Materials

2D materials offer a promising alternative for future electronics. Their atomic-scale thickness allows for greater flexibility and efficiency. The Penn State team demonstrated that a computer built entirely from 2D materials can perform basic arithmetic functions. This breakthrough suggests that 2D materials could eventually replace silicon entirely.
Global Research Efforts

Research on 2D materials is not limited to the United States. Institutions worldwide, including Fudan University in China, are exploring their potential. These efforts aim to support silicon initially and eventually transition away from it. The competitive landscape indicates a global race to innovate in semiconductor technology.
Challenges Ahead

Despite the promising developments, several challenges remain. The operating speed of 25 kiloHertz achieved by the 2D computer is slower than that of silicon-based systems. Issues such as channel mobility, reliability, and scalability need to be addressed. Additionally, infrastructure for commercial translation of these technologies is still lacking in many regions.
Future Implications

The advancements in 2D materials could redefine the semiconductor landscape. They offer opportunities for improved performance and energy efficiency. The transition from silicon to 2D materials could lead to a new era of electronics, encouraging innovations that align with Moore’s Law in spirit, if not in practice.
#2DMaterials
#Nanotechnology
#GrapheneTech
#AdvancedMaterials
#Nanoelectronics
#FlexibleElectronics
#NextGenComputing
#QuantumMaterials
#MaterialScience

Continuous Feedback Is a Lie Without Psychological Safety

  Psychological safety describes a workplace atmosphere in which people feel free to share ideas, take calculated risks, acknowledge errors,...